From Keith Humphreys, in the style of Harper’s Index:
- Number of gun shops at or near the 1,970 mile U.S.-Mexico Border: 7,600
- Proportion of those gun shops that are on the U.S. side: 100%
Good Neighbor Policy
October 5, 2011Posted by Jay Livingston
From Keith Humphreys, in the style of Harper’s Index:
From Keith Humphreys, in the style of Harper’s Index:
And Get Me Rewrite
October 4, 2011
Posted by Jay Livingston
The blog Aluation has this fascinating post.
That’s the whole thing – two sentences from two versions of the same news story. And two different by-lines. I don’t know what Colin Moynihan’s official position at the Times is, but Al Baker is the chief of the Times police bureau. Write your own story as to how this change happened.
Aluation’s post just prior to this is a long and informative analysis of the same topic – press coverage of Occupy Wall Street and protests in other countries: “bold political protesters abroad, stupid criminal hippies at home.”
Posted by Jay Livingston
The blog Aluation has this fascinating post.
That’s the whole thing – two sentences from two versions of the same news story. And two different by-lines. I don’t know what Colin Moynihan’s official position at the Times is, but Al Baker is the chief of the Times police bureau. Write your own story as to how this change happened.
Aluation’s post just prior to this is a long and informative analysis of the same topic – press coverage of Occupy Wall Street and protests in other countries: “bold political protesters abroad, stupid criminal hippies at home.”
Taxes and Freedom
October 3, 2011
Posted by Jay Livingston
Denmark is adding a tax on fatty foods to the already hefty tax burden on their citizens.
In the US, nobody in public life can get away with saying a good word about taxes. Maybe Warren Buffet, but he’s not running for office. The Republican mantra “It’s your money, it’s not the government’s money” has great appeal, and the Republicans and Tea Partistas have clearly stated their preference that government shut down rather than raise taxes to pay for what the government does.
After all, less government equals more freedom. Or does it?
Bruce Bartlett at the Times Economix blog,checked out some of those low-tax countries, nations that are well below the 27% tax-to-GDP ratio of the US. Then he went to the Heritage Foundation site to see how these nations ranked on the Heritage Index of Economic Freedom. Here are the results. (On the Freedom Index, a high score is good. A score above 80 (only six countries) is “free”; a score below 50 is “repressed.”)
(The tax-to-GDP ratio is very slightly different from what you find here, and obviously the score on Libya is from before the fall of Gaddafi.)
Where to go if I couldn’t stay in the US – Chad or Denmark? The freedom of low taxes or the high-tax nanny state? It’s a tough choice, but I think I’d go with Denmark even though language might be a problem. The only Danish I know is prune.
Posted by Jay Livingston
Denmark is adding a tax on fatty foods to the already hefty tax burden on their citizens.
In the US, nobody in public life can get away with saying a good word about taxes. Maybe Warren Buffet, but he’s not running for office. The Republican mantra “It’s your money, it’s not the government’s money” has great appeal, and the Republicans and Tea Partistas have clearly stated their preference that government shut down rather than raise taxes to pay for what the government does.
After all, less government equals more freedom. Or does it?
Bruce Bartlett at the Times Economix blog,checked out some of those low-tax countries, nations that are well below the 27% tax-to-GDP ratio of the US. Then he went to the Heritage Foundation site to see how these nations ranked on the Heritage Index of Economic Freedom. Here are the results. (On the Freedom Index, a high score is good. A score above 80 (only six countries) is “free”; a score below 50 is “repressed.”)
(The tax-to-GDP ratio is very slightly different from what you find here, and obviously the score on Libya is from before the fall of Gaddafi.)
Where to go if I couldn’t stay in the US – Chad or Denmark? The freedom of low taxes or the high-tax nanny state? It’s a tough choice, but I think I’d go with Denmark even though language might be a problem. The only Danish I know is prune.
Moneyball
September 30, 2011
Posted by Jay Livingston
Stanford is a three-touchdown favorite over UCLA tomorrow night. Which is the more desirable team?
If you said Stanford, you’re probably one of those people who thinks that the Big Ten consists of ten schools. You probably also thought that football was all about points on the board – six for a touchdown, three for a field goal, and so on. Silly you.
As the recent (and perhaps continuing) realignment of conferences makes clear, college football is about points, but they are Nielsen points. And on the Nielsen scoreboard, UCLA crushes Stanford.
HT: My colleague George Martin for calling Silver's article to my attention.
UPDATE, Oct. 2: By game time, UCLA was a 23-point underdogs. Stanford won 45 - 19. No information yet on how many viewers watched the game on TV.
Posted by Jay Livingston
Stanford is a three-touchdown favorite over UCLA tomorrow night. Which is the more desirable team?
If you said Stanford, you’re probably one of those people who thinks that the Big Ten consists of ten schools. You probably also thought that football was all about points on the board – six for a touchdown, three for a field goal, and so on. Silly you.
As the recent (and perhaps continuing) realignment of conferences makes clear, college football is about points, but they are Nielsen points. And on the Nielsen scoreboard, UCLA crushes Stanford.
The graphic is from a Nate Silver article at The New York Times (here). It’s the companion piece to Taylor Branch’s recent article in the Atlantic. Branch gives the sordid details. Nate Silver provides the systematic numbers – fan base and TV market share. What both make clear is that college football is not about good match-ups. It’s about good profits.
The S.E.C.’s interest in Texas A&M becomes easier to understand once you recognize that the Aggies have among the largest fan bases in the country. The fact that Notre Dame’s fans are dispersed throughout the country explains why they’ve been loathe to join a conference. And that the West Coast is less enthusiastic about football than other parts of the country, making the Pacific-12 a harder sale to the television networks, explains why the conference is going to great lengths to expand into football-crazy states like Texas.Not to go all Marxist here, but by design, the money flows entirely to the networks, to the universities, and to the coaches. The workers who put their bodies on the line get nothing. Actually some of them do get some trinkets and favors, but in the ideal world of the NCAA, they are supposed to get zero dollars. After all, they are not workers. They are scholar-athletes, and they do get scholarships, which are worth something, though it’s questionable whether they get much of an education. But even though they produce substantial amounts of revenue for other people, they are not workers. Running back Kent Waldrep was paralyzed during a game in 1974. When his university stopped paying for his medical bills, he sued for workers’ compensation.
The appeals court finally rejected Waldrep’s claim in June of 2000, ruling that he was not an employee because he had not paid taxes on financial aid that he could have kept even if he quit football.The university – ironists take note – was Texas Christian.
HT: My colleague George Martin for calling Silver's article to my attention.
UPDATE, Oct. 2: By game time, UCLA was a 23-point underdogs. Stanford won 45 - 19. No information yet on how many viewers watched the game on TV.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)