Posted by Jay Livingston
1. The Statistical Wisdom of Oddsmakers.
Andrew Gelman writes:
if you look up "football" in the index of Bayesian Data Analysis, you'll see that football point spreads are accurate to within a standard deviation of 14 points, with the discrepancy being approximately normally distributed. So, a 14-point underdog has something like a 15% chance of winning. It's funny how people don't get this sort of thing.The Giants were a 12-point underdog. The money line was about 9:2 – very close to the line Andrew would have set given the point-spread. Do bookies all have well-thumbed copies of Bayesian Data Analysis on their bookshelves?
2. The NonWisdom of Oddsmakers, the Wisdom of Crowds.
The oddsmakers set the opening line at 13 ½, but not because they thought that represented the strengths of the teams. They thought that the “true” line should be 12 or 12 ½.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6a54/c6a546611deca56ab73801cd58143209089d99fa" alt=""
But from the start, the supposedly naive money came in on the Giants. The line came down, and people still bet the Giants. The bookies took a bath. It happens.
3. Local Color.
David Tyree, the Giant who made The Catch, is a graduate of Montclair High School.
For other posts in this blog on football, betting, and the wisdom of crowds, go here.
No comments:
Post a Comment