Posted by Jay Livingston
If you don’t like the way the majority votes, it’s always tempting to attribute their behavior to ignorance, emotion, or some other nonrational or inferior mental state.
Here is this morning’s Wall Street Journal headline about the election in France:
Voter Anger Sweeps Europe
Most newspapers headlines reported the French election as a matter of policy. The voters rejected economic policies of austerity – not so illogical, since there was little evidence that those policies were working. But the headline writers at the WSJ saw the French majority as letting their emotions get the best of them. The WSJ story reports only on France, but the headline sees all of Europe as caught up in this contagious emotion.
Voters do sometimes share emotions. Hope and optimism characterized a segment of Obama voters in 2008, and there was probably systematic evidence for that description. Two years later, the Tea Partiers were often angry (they still are).
Anger might have been the principle motive yesterday in France, but the WSJ story offers only two bits of evidence:
- 20% voted for far-right candidate Marine LePen two weeks ago in the premier tour
- only 81% of the electorate actually went to the polls
Ah, what to do about those irrational voters? In 1970, when Chileans democratically elected Salvador Allende, US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said, in a now famous quote, “I see no reason why we should allow a country to go Communist just because of the irresponsibility of its citizens.”
Unlike Kissinger, the WSJ is not underwriting a coup against the Socialists. Not yet.
1 comment:
When a party have 15-20% at every big election for 15 years, keep saying it's a matter of emotions... The FN is full of hate and frankly disgusting, but in some way is root to some groups.
Same story about the non-voters : Nihil novi sub sole. Sadly.
And frankly, if Hollande is the new socialist menace, capitalism could sleep in peace.
Post a Comment