Posted by Jay Livingston
Speaking of victimless crimes* (as I was in the last post), the New York Times yesterday reported on baggy pants laws that have been passed in some towns. In Mansfield, LA, wear
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhH4JKdtN92lWGqKGWffa36rtAs6U5GUKrchDKp_cCWUlYkN6v7n2liiqpsY3hyphenhyphenbJ64wK2zOSK_yLbDQzP5HFUpCpzBL8-XH_VJE5W8P6eQstsbK59P15IV9Wi229udsVHAvR_kVQ/s400/Baggy.jpg)
Other towns have passed similar laws; state legislatures have come close. The laws are couched as “indecency” laws. But that seems pretty lame since the law is about cloth, not skin. It’s not about showing your butt, it’s about what you use to cover your butt: jeans, good; jeans with boxers, bad. Presumably, if the offender stripped off his jeans entirely and walked around in basketball shorts – maybe even plaid ones – there’d be no problem.
The real issue, as the Times points out, is hip-hop and all its impli
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjr-Y6-CHrmGCwOqLJCqoqB_pkgMJd0Dryv76JFmlBjRY6DNt3lcTz-o3e4JP913osHVAWCRy21f5j5H3fW9i3ATA4IR5g8PmuPC7GPJj6PpejryefOIkvOLK-pAzZiMxsGiI7Oew/s400/baggy-jeans-2.jpg)
People have often reacted to outward appearance in this way. We all judge others on their appearance, and sometimes the judgments become extreme. Violent fashionistas beat up zoot suiters in the 1940s, longhairs in the 60s and 70s. Institutions, notably schools, are similarly sensitive to seemingly small matters of style. At my school, leaving your shirttail out or turning your collar up in back were punishable offenses. The NBA has regulations limiting the length of basketball shorts. It’s not that the players are showing too much leg but too little.
Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale and the other end of the Eastern time zone, Brattleboro, VT, has just overturned its ban on public nudity. (Sorry, no pictures, but here’s a link to the story.) If you want to walk around downtown letting it all hang out, Brattleboro’s the place to be, at least for the next few weeks before the weather starts to turn.
(* I realize that we are now supposed to refer to these as “public-order offenses” or “non-predatory crimes,” but I think Schur’s original term, if less strictly accurate, better conveys the moral idea.)
(Hat tip on the Brattleboro story to my friend Alice, whose young grandchildren live there.)
2 comments:
Damn! I was in Brattleborro, if only I knew! ;)
Nice entry you have in here.
If you want to walk around downtown letting it all hang out, Brattleboro’s the place to be, at least for the next few weeks before the weather starts to turn.
Post a Comment